Game Development Community

Resource link to file on GG site, did the file move?

by Kenneth Eves · in Site Feedback · 09/20/2012 (4:35 am) · 6 replies

I'm trying to hit:

http://static.garagegames.com/static/pg/resource/15320.improvedaiguardunit.zip

... but it comes up 404.

Has this file moved?

#1
09/20/2012 (5:12 am)
May try this one.
http://www.garagegames.com/community/resources/view/15320

humm the T3D 1.1 is there but not TGE 1.5.2 one.
#2
09/20/2012 (6:19 am)
Yep, same for me.

The 1.52 version is needed for TGEA, just a couple tweaks to apply it.

Most likely it just got moved somewhere with all the work that's going on.
#3
09/20/2012 (8:01 am)
GG have not hosted resource files for some years.

Files are now kept on depositories outside of GG and it is up to the users/owners to post them.

torque.abigholeintheweb.com/public_system/useruploads was the old one - note site is no longer updated and has been superceded by HNC gamers - which I don't have a link for but you can search GG for the info.
#4
09/20/2012 (10:40 am)
Link to abighole.hngamers.com

Like Steve mentioned, GarageGames hasn't hosted files for Resources for some time, and unfortunately there appears to be a loss of the older ones every time that the website has been updated in the past few years.

Some of us have archived many of the Resources, just not all of them. If we do have it, but don't know that a Resource's accompanying files are no longer available we don't bother to upload them.


15320.improvedaiguardunit.zip
#5
09/20/2012 (2:50 pm)
Whew, thank-you kindly.

I'll look through my fileserver. I have a bunch archived. I'll see what is missing and push them to the server.

A huge help, thanks again.
#6
09/20/2012 (3:07 pm)
The T3D version is basically the same as the TGE/TGEA one, in fact it actually has a couple of bug fixes that the other versions didn't. So I'd recommend using that version instead. At some point in the not too distant future, I plan to update the T3D version to work with the MIT licensed version of T3D (although it likely needs very little done to it) and I'll remove the dead link as well.