...
by Joseph_7 · in Site Feedback · 09/09/2010 (3:35 am) · 7 replies
...
#2
09/09/2010 (4:21 pm)
Yes, the OED definitely confirms it as a word. It is even used by Keats and Sir Walter Raleigh. 
#5
I was trying to figure out if you were an English Major or just comprehended a rather dimension understanding to the English language. But it do not matter.
Im sorry my comment was upsetting, I strive to be more thoughtful.
EDIT: Keats and Sir Walter Raleigh are two of my favorite people, you should get to know them, they have wisdom to share.
09/10/2010 (7:27 am)
Architected, is more a team(as in multiple minds working for the same goal) inclusive word. Not something one would tittle themselves as an individual.Quote:Were you trying to write: 'Architected does not have...' and 'Why is "Architected" not a word, do you think?'?
I was trying to figure out if you were an English Major or just comprehended a rather dimension understanding to the English language. But it do not matter.
Im sorry my comment was upsetting, I strive to be more thoughtful.
EDIT: Keats and Sir Walter Raleigh are two of my favorite people, you should get to know them, they have wisdom to share.
#7
Not that it really matters much in such discussions. You just seemed extremely upset about it.
09/10/2010 (1:32 pm)
I hold an MFA in Theatre with minors in English and Socio-Cultural Anthropology from my BA days, so I know who both Keats and Raleigh are. I also hold a subscription to the OED since I have used it extensively in research and graduate work, especially in terms of etymology. I will probably let it lapse this year since this was the first time that I used it in over a month.Not that it really matters much in such discussions. You just seemed extremely upset about it.
Torque 3D Owner Caylo Gypsyblood
Architected do not have the same meaning as "designed" or "built".
Why is not Architected a word, do you think?