My own 3rd Person Camera, possible with TorqueScript?

#1 Unfortunately, the camera operation for the fine-grain control that you require is not exposed to script.

If you had a source license, then Brian Wests' GameCamera is a nice little resource:
http://www.garagegames.com/mg/forums/result.thread.php?qt=67176

#2 Tanks Blake,
I will probably buy a Torque License next year. At this moment am becoming Familiar with its faboulous TorqueScript. For my project, i just only need to make a modification in the Camera movements and bit on the AI to.
Tanks for the answers,
@+

#3 If you have a project you want to start in the next year or so then you shouldn't go down this route, but Torque 2 will most likely have the functionality you're looking for. If right now you're just learning, learn Torquescript and everything you can and then move on up to T2.

#4 If you want to start a project in the next 6 to 9 months, then existing tech is definitely the way to go.

#5 @David & Sam:
At the moment i dont need source code to make changes, TorqueScript will do my job. But as Sam says, if Torque2 have everything i need, sure il take a source license for it. First i need to know how Torque works, is that what am doing at this moment :D.

Am trying to recreate my current project with Torque Engine ( and torquescript ). This will help me learn alot about this technology.

@Sam:
Torque 2?
You mean, Torque X 3D?
So, Torque 2 will have better AI functions ( pathfinding, FSM, etc ) and camera ( full control with TorqueScript ) functions?

Again, tanks guys.
@+

#6 No. Torque 2 is a compete engine refactoring. The componentization of the TorqueX engine was a good first run, but Torque 2 will be a C++ engine without XNA or C# ties.

For more information on Torque 2

Torque 2 is not your answer in terms of AI functionality and such, but it allows the development team to add components to the engine without refactoring several integrated pieces. But that is a C++ job.

It is in design and development currently, and as the community site opens, we will know more about it.

For right now, I would stick with Torque or move to Torque X and learn C#.

#7 I have good knowlege of vb.net and i dont like c++ ^^.
Do Torque X run with vb.net at the same speed of c#.net? Or it will be better to code with c#.net?
Tanks,
@+

#8 XNA (and therefore TorqueX) only support C#. There have been some projects to get XNA working for PC distribution in VB, but if you know VB, C# shouldn't be too big of a step. And it would solve compatibility problems later.

#9 Some one told me that C# easiest than vb.net.
I better take somes C# tutos before is too late ^^.

Tanks Blake,
@+