Minimum for ShapeBase replacement?

#1 Er... I dunno, what do you need?

ShapeBase isn't really special. Or are you asking about, if you wanted to reimplement it, what things other classes depend on?

In which case... pretty much all of it. You'll end up having to break stuff and repair it if you reimplement ShapeBase.

#2 I want to re-implement it as a different class and then not use ShapeBase as I don't need animated characters. I don't need to mount the camera to the replacement, nor do I need weapons, animations, collisions, physics etc. I just need a class with the bare minimum.

Thanks

#3 Isnt that gamebase itself?

#4 I want to use it as a basic starting point to add my own game specific data items back in. Note that I only need a few (half dozen or less) pieces of data. I just would prefer to start with something like ShapeBase that was reduced to it's bare minimum before I do this. Am I making sense, or just leaving you all shaking your heads? :)

Thanks

#5 Asking Clark Fagot (bravetree) about thisd might give you some good info, as he did exactly that for thinktanks iirc.
hth

#6 It sounds like you don't need our input... I mean, if you're not going for backwards compatibility, what can we tell you beyond, "Yeah, go for it!"?