Az's 2 on 2 Scrum Bonanza

#221 @Tally

We eagerly await you. Please don't forget the other D.Q. stamps on your ladder - Mike and Filbert for a no show and Prey and Flea because they couldn't play until next week.

jangles

#222 Sure Tal. Are we talkin Benjamins? Naw

#223 I apologize for my incoherent tone and lackluster play.
my jar needs waxin'.

#224 Someone changed the password. I can't get in.
Stimpy

#225 Same pw that I mailed..i'll mail u again

#226 Tally move Foul Play and myself up to the third round.

GG's Destroyer & Stimpy!!!

Az

#227 WOOHOOO WERE COMING FOR YOU TANKY AND J YOU BASTARDS
FP

#228 You have to beat G and S first! Then they have to beat TH and B. Good players all.

#229 Those bastards! Stimp/ Destroyer, how much did they beat you by?

-ACA

#230 @ Az/FP

How about tomorrow? Say 7:30 PM PDT/10:30 PM EDT?

Ge0rge

#231 Lets go Team #12 For a losers match?

#232 You could have a D.Q. match... but would anyone show up?

"Need to practice more 2 on 2 before playing anymore games on record."
-- 56k

#233 Entrys for "non-winners" match?:

Racer445 & Cpt rik
ACA & Ttank
Jinx & NME
Mike & Filbert
Lag Man & Paco
Cowboy & Reagent X
Daim Branage & Major
LC50 & Shoot Me

Is This Ok?


Racer445- Organizer of the "Non-winners" match.

#234 After this can we try out a 3/3 league?

#235 Here it is:

Racer445 & Cpt rik
VS.
ACA & iTank

Jinx & NME
VS.
Mike & Filbert

Lag Man & Paco
VS.
Cowboy & Reagent X

Daim Branage & Major
VS.
LC50 & Shoot Me


Plus i second the 3 on 3 idea

#236 Hay Racer, interesting concept, but if I may make a suggestion... maybe you should start up a new
Thread for that...

I oppose the 3 on 3 idea. 2 of the teams were DQed because of scheduling. adding a third player to the team would increase that problem by a third.

I say keep it 2 on 2, but have players on the sideline ready to take someone's place, incase that person is unavailable to compete. With all the replacement scrummers (like me) that were ready willing and able to compete, I don't think there should've been any DQ's.

#237 Assuming we that everyone involved in this ladder wants to play in the next one, we have 32 players. to fill out a 16 team 3 on 3 ladder, we'd need 16 more players.

start recruiting for this POSSIBLE tournament. Az et at must discuss.

conversly, we could have an expanded 16+2 team tournament, 2 byes going to the two finalists for this tourney.

#238 Asking ahead of time, in the next season will you be my teammate, Az??!!

#239 Well Filbert that would be fine but I would assume I'd be playing with Mr. Play again.

George and Sherman, weekend nights are good for us or at 10:30pm PST week nights. What works for you?

The main problem as I see it for going to a 3 man format is just coming up with another 16 players who can make the commitment to participate. It would really help if people could let others know about the forums here I think. Since the game is now distributed by Shockwave as well as GG's, many people still don't know about the boards.

Az

#240 It's distributed by Real One Arcade now too. What if GG's added a link to the forums
in the online game screen. An idea worth presenting???